Who should care? This development primarily affects Chinese business executives and investors who frequently travel to the U.S. for company expansions or investment projects — specifically those using L-1 intracompany transfer visas, EB-1C multinational executive green cards, and EB-5 investor visas. Since many sanctuary cities include major international hubs like San Francisco and Los Angeles, these potential restrictions could disrupt your typical travel routes and cause unexpected delays.
What is changing? The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has announced it may cease processing international arrivals at certain airports located in sanctuary cities. This policy aims to enforce immigration laws more strictly but could lead to suspension or reduction of customs and border protection (CBP) services at affected airports. Although no final list is public yet, major sanctuary city airports such as San Francisco International (SFO) and Los Angeles International (LAX) are likely candidates.
Practical steps you can take now:
- 1Verify your visa validity and I-94 expiration on the USCIS or CBP websites immediately upon booking travel. For L-1 and EB-1C applicants, ensure your visa stamp and supporting documents are valid for re-entry without issues.
- 2Coordinate with your U.S. employer or investment project manager to consider alternative airports outside sanctuary cities, such as Dallas (DFW), Seattle (SEA), or Chicago (ORD), where processing is expected to remain normal.
- 3If you hold pending petitions or adjustment of status cases (e.g., EB-1C or EB-5), avoid scheduling travel through affected airports until DHS confirms operational status.
- 4For EB-5 investors, maintain meticulous records of your investment and visa status, as any delay in entry might affect your ability to meet continuous physical presence requirements (INA §216A).
A recent case from our practice illustrates the impact: last month, a fintech executive on an L-1A visa planned to enter through SFO but encountered processing delays due to staffing shifts caused by local enforcement policies. We advised rerouting through Seattle, which allowed timely arrival for critical board meetings and avoided jeopardizing his status renewal timeline.
From a legal perspective, under 8 CFR 214.2(l)(3)(ii), L-1 visa holders must maintain continuous employment and lawful status during entry. Unplanned delays or denials at the port of entry could trigger status violations, complicating future renewals or green card applications. Similarly, EB-5 investors must carefully track their physical presence in the U.S. to satisfy conditional residency requirements, which could be disrupted by processing interruptions.
What this means for you: If you are a corporate executive or investor traveling on L-1, EB-1C, or EB-5 visas, now is the time to review your upcoming travel itineraries, confirm visa validity, and plan alternative entry points outside sanctuary cities. Taking these steps will help safeguard your immigration status and business operations amid evolving enforcement policies.
Data Sources
[1] U.S. Department of State, travel.state.gov [2] USCIS, uscis.gov
