Q

What does the new USCIS policy on signature validity mean for my immigration petition?

A
USCIS has clarified that benefit requests with invalid or missing signatures may be denied outright, rather than just issued an RFE. This means any petition, including L-1, EB-1C, or EB-5 filings, must have properly executed signatures as per 8 CFR §103.2(a)(7). From our experience, even minor deviations like electronic signatures not matching USCIS standards or unsigned forms have led to denial rather than a chance to correct.
Q

How can I ensure my petition’s signature complies with USCIS requirements?

A
We advise clients to meticulously review signature sections on all forms before filing. For example, I-129 (L-1/H-1B) and I-526 (EB-5) require original ink signatures by the petitioner or authorized signatory. USCIS does not accept signatures by stamps or third parties without proper authorization. Our practice includes a final checklist confirming signature validity and signer identity, which has helped prevent rejections in over 30 cases last year.
Q

What should corporate clients do differently in light of this change?

A
For Chinese corporate executives applying under L-1 or EB-1C, it is critical to have the designated company officer or authorized representative sign all petitions. We recommend companies assign a responsible person and maintain a signature log. For EB-5 investors, personal signature on the I-526 petition is mandatory; avoid relying on agents to sign on your behalf. These steps minimize risks of denial due to signature issues.
Q

If a petition was filed with an invalid signature, what remedies are available?

A
Once USCIS issues a denial based on signature invalidity, reopening or reconsideration is possible but time-consuming and costly. Proactively, we suggest clients double-check signature compliance before submission. If you receive a denial for this reason, consult your attorney immediately to file a motion to reopen citing 8 CFR §103.5. However, prevention is always more efficient than remediation.

In sum, this policy shift means clients must treat signature validity as a critical compliance item. From our practical standpoint, implementing a rigorous internal review process before filing can save months of delay and thousands of dollars in re-filing fees. We encourage companies and investors to update their document handling protocols accordingly.